CO-OPERATIVE Group has confirmed it will retain just 30% of the equity in its banking arm after agreeing a plan to plug a £1.5 billion capital gap.
The deal comes after weeks of negotiations with bond-holders in the bank who had faced taking a financial hit on their investments.
Originally Co-operative Group, headed by Edinburgh-born Euan Sutherland, outlined a rescue plan where it would contribute £1bn gathered from disposals and restructuring and fund another £500 million by writing down the value of its bonds.
Mr Sutherland had previously suggested there was "no plan B" to the proposal he unveiled in June.
However, an influential group of bondholders, including US hedge funds Aurelius Capital and Silver Point Capital, appear to have changed his mind as yesterday Co-operative Group admitted the recapitalisation plan will be "materially different".
Mr Sutherland, who ran do-it-yourself chain B&Q before joining Co-operative Group in May, said: "We have reached an agreement in principle which saves the Co-operative Bank.
"This is the first bank to be rescued and to survive as a standalone entity without taxpayer money."
The proposals are believed to meet new European directives which force bondholders and depositors, rather than taxpayers, to bear the cost of failed banks.
Co-operative Group will be the largest single shareholder in the bank - which will float on the stock market - with Mr Sutherland pledging to retain its ethos.
He said: "We are embedding Co-operative principles in the constitution of the bank to guarantee this."
But Andre Spicer, professor of organisational behaviour at Cass Business School, questioned whether Co-op can stay true to its roots once it is beholden to shareholders in the open market.
He said: "It is unlikely that the Co-op will maintain its ethical approach in the long run.
"History suggests that once a mutual bank is privatised it drops the focus on doing good to focus on doing well for shareholders.
"Private control of the Co-op will also have other outcomes. The number of staff the Co-op employs is likely to drop as management search for efficiencies. Staff who remain are likely to find themselves loaded down with various restructuring efforts."
It is expected the existing management of Co-op Bank will continue in place. Many of the bad loans it has on its books, particularly in commercial property, came from the takeover of Britannia Building Society in 2009.
Co-op then embarked on the failed Project Verde deal to buy more than 600 branches from Lloyds Banking Group.
Most of the executives who were in charge at Co-op Bank in that period have now left.
Further details on the exact offers to bondholders are likely to be revealed before the end of the month but Mr Sutherland said the Group had been working to "build a fair and attractive proposal for small investors".
It is expected small retail investors will be given an option to get an income bearing financial product while institutional investors are thought likely to take equity.
Mark Taber, who has campaigned on behalf of retail investors, said: "If they are being offered a bond, the terms will be important.
"They will need to consider how it's going to be structured and approached and the mechanics of it and make sure people aren't treated unfairly within it or left out."
A stock market listing of the bank - which has 4.7 million customers and employs 10,000 people - is likely to happen towards the end of this year or early next year.
Co-op Bank's bonds were suspended from trading on the London Stock Exchange at the bank's request.
The bank said it would request the suspension be lifted when the full details of the recapitalisation plan are announced.
Separately, Co-op Bank confirmed it was setting aside a further £105m for customer compensation. It said this is related to areas such as personal payment insurance mis-selling, arrears charges, processing of certain mortgage interest payments and what was described as a "technical" breach of the Consumer Credit Act.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article