Penalties issued to Scottish companies for late filing of accounts surged by 75% in the wake of the financial crisis, according to analysis by law firm Pinsent Masons.
Companies House collected £82.3 million in the 2012/2013 financial year, up from £53m in 2007/08.
In the first three months of the current financial year, however, fine collection has eased from £20.6m to £20.1m compared with the same period last year.
Corporate law experts at Pinsent Masons say a more stringent penalty regime is responsible for the sharp increase, with SMEs suffering the most as they grapple with increasingly complex accounting requirements.
In 2009 Companies House revised its penalty regime for late filing, at the same time as public and private companies felt the impact of a reduced time frame in which documents must be submitted to the registrar.
Companies House can now multiply any outstanding penalties issued to companies that consistently file annual accounts after the deadline, effectively aggregating fines.
Pinsents said the issue seems to be particularly acute in Scotland, where the value of penalties collected increased by 75% since 2007/08, compared with 54% in England and Wales.
Business Secretary Vince Cable has launched a consultation on further measures to improve transparency in business, imposing tougher rules on public and private companies in the UK.
Pinsents said the new rules are hitting SMEs the hardest as they struggle to cut through red tape and an onslaught of new regulation. New rules on directors' reports and board remuneration arrive in October.
Martin Webster, partner at the firm, said: "Unlike large scale companies, capacity is an issue and it's unsurprising that smaller companies fail to hit Companies House deadlines and then suffer the consequences.
"High standard of transparency are one of the defining characteristics of UK Plc. The question now must be whether a more appropriate balance can be struck between corporate bureaucracy and targeting those who disregard the rules."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article