FORMER Scotgold Resources chairman Shane Sadleir, hitherto its largest investor, has sold a further slug of shares, leaving him with a negligible interest in the company which has ambitions to dig precious metals out of the hills of Argyll.
The sale by Mr Sadleir, who quit Scotgold's board in April, comes as the company continues to seek financing to open the Cononish mine after recent falls in the gold price.
Scotgold yesterday told investors that, at the end of last week, it was notified by Mr Sadleir he had sold 3,937,500 shares.
The sale price was not disclosed but at prevailing prices the shares would have been worth £40,000.
Mr Sadleir is a soil scientist and geologist who has been involved in exploration projects in Australia.
He retains around six million shares, worth £66,000.
His holding has fallen from 4.7% to below 3% mark at which he must notify Scotgold and the stock market about changes in his stake.
The latest sale comes two months after Scotgold revealed that Mr Sadleir had sold more than five million shares in batches between April 17 and May 27.
Scotgold, led by Chris Sangster, needs to raise around £23.2 million to develop the mine near Tyndrum. Financing from its South African-based banker RMB Resources is conditional on it raising sufficient equity for the project.
It put its plans on hold in May and told investors it was halting discretionary expenditure.
Scotgold, which is listed on the Alternative Investment Market and in Australia, received planning permission in 2012 to develop the site. It expects to recover 121,800 ounces of gold and 469,700 ounces of silver.
In its final development study published in April, Scotgold said at prevailing prices it expected £39.8m of pre-tax cashflow over the mine's seven-year life.
This would allow it to pay back development costs 26 months after the start of production.
A year ago when gold was trading at $1655 an ounce, it predicted cash of £65.9m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article