ROYAL Bank of Scotland's plunging share price has prompted long-sceptical analysts at Investec to upgrade the stock from "sell" to "hold".
But in a falling market, shares in the part-nationalised lender still closed down on the day, shedding 0.8p or 0.3% to finish at 280.9p.
Edinburgh-based RBS has come under pressure after announcing the departure of chief executive Stephen Hester earlier this month. Its share collapse was accelerated by Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne's announcement he is considering dividing the bank into an unsullied "good" bank that can be privatised and a "bad" one containing its toxic debt. This created uncertainty about the timing of any sell-off in shares of the 81% state-owned lender.
Ian Gordon, analyst at Investec, wrote in a note for clients: "Enough! The RBS share price has collapsed by 12% in two days, and by 20% in a month, reclaiming its position as the worst performing UK bank year-to-date.
"Given increased political disarray, despite deep 'valuation support', we do acknowledge the potential for further near-term weakness."
Mr Gordon added: "More fundamental investors should place reliance on the fact the Chancellor must surely see the folly (and cost) of a good bank/bad bank split. As such, based on a broadly unchanged outlook, we now see modest value."
Investec is more pessimistic than many brokers on RBS's prospects although Mr Gordon highlighted the potential benefits for RBS from rising mortgage lending and improvements in loan default rates in Ireland.
Investec raised its target price on the stock to 305p from 300p.
The broker's preferences remain Barclays and Asia-focused Standard Chartered.
The taxpayer bought into RBS at the equivalent of 502p a share. However, the holding is valued on the Government's books at 407p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article