Supermarket Morrisons has slumped to a loss of £792 million after it wrote down the value of its store estate in the face of tough market conditions.
The struggling chain also highlighted another year of falling sales as underlying profits - excluding the £1.3 billion one-off property hit - fell 52 per cent to £345 million in the year to February 1.
It announced that it will close 23 under-performing M Local stores during the current financial year, having recently disclosed plans to shut 10 smaller supermarket this year.
The results come days before new chief executive David Potts, who has more than 40 years retailing experience at Tesco, takes his post.
Mr Potts replaces former boss Dalton Philips, who was ousted a year after the announcement of a three-year £1 billion programme to cut prices to fight the supermarket price war. Mr Phillips had led the retailer since 2010.
Chairman Andrew Higginson said: "Last year's trading environment was tough and we don't expect any change this year. However, Morrisons is a strong, distinctive business."
Like-for-like sales were down 5.9 per cent across the year but the trend in the final quarter showed signs of improvement with a decline of 2.6 per cent.
Morrisons said consumer confidence has started to recover but with real disposable incomes still short of pre-2008 levels the chain said customers are unlikely to return to old shopping habits in the near term.
It said: "Shopping around for the best value and shopping more frequently are trends that look set to continue."
The property write-down stems from the company's assessment of every store's recoverable amount compared to its book value. Stripping out the one-off item, the profits performance was broadly in line with City expectations.
It increased its total dividend payment by five per cent to 13.65p a share but warned that its commitment for this year was to pay "not less than 5p a share".
However retail analysts at Jefferies said: "Morrisons remains our favoured UK grocer given clearly improving trading momentum and pricing position, a more attractive valuation and a superior balance sheet."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article