THE chief financial officer of Royal Dutch Shell, Simon Henry, has underlined the company's enthusiasm for West of Shetland but signalled it may sell assets off other parts of Scotland.
He criticised UK Governments for making "arbitary and unexpected" tax changes over the years, which have made the oil and gas giant less willing to invest in some areas of the United Kingdom Continental Shelf than others.
Asked if a vote for independence for Scotland next year could affect Shell's interest in the North Sea, Mr Henry stressed the company wanted stability in the tax regime above all.
Talking to journalists after Shell announced a 32% fall in third quarter profits, Mr Henry made it clear the North Sea faces stiff competition from other areas with the company set to make tough choices about where to invest.
As number two to the outgoing chief executive Peter Voser, Mr Henry will play a key part in this process.
Asked how the North Sea would fit in the company's plans he indicated Shell's views differed depending on which area of it is under discussion.
West of Shetland, where Shell is investing in the multi-billion pound Clair and Schiehallion projects with BP and other majors, is a favoured area.
"We have two great growth projects in Clair and Schiehallion, which are both significant investment activities at the moment," said Mr Henry. "Those assets will be quite important parts of our portfolio for a very long time to come I would expect."
Mr Henry said Shell has good gas assets in the southern North Sea, off eastern England, operated out of the Netherlands.
Noting Shell expects to increase the pace of disposals, Mr Henry appeared to indicate assets in the Central North Sea, off eastern Scotland, may be sale candidates.
He said: "We have central North Sea assets which are part of some of the operational challenges that we have. These are mature assets and we need to be thinking about future decommissioning."
Mr Henry added: "Mature assets are always part of a discussion about how long do we keep these but it's just part of a normal tail-end asset review."
Independents including Enquest have shown their appetite for North Sea acquisitions.
Shell has interests in more than 50 UK North Sea fields.
Asked about Scotland possibly voting for independence in the referendum next September, Mr Henry said: "We try to stay out of such geopolitics in general and reiterate that our wish and our need for investment is a long-term stable energy policy and fiscal framework. What we don't need is arbitrary and unexpected changes in fiscal regimes. I can't speak for Scotland, but the UK has a track record of exactly this, which has affected our own willingness to invest in the UK in the past."
Mr Henry indicated recent concessions by the UK Government have not affected the company's view.
Noting Clair and Schiehallion account for the bulk of Shell's current investment in Europe, he said directors believe European energy policy and potentially fiscal frameworks don't provide the stability needed.
"Almost all of our investment is going into a combination of North America and emerging markets," he noted.
Shell posted underlying profits of $4.5bn (£2.8bn) for the quarter to September, compared with $6.6bn in the same period last year.
Mr Voser, who is leaving Shell at the end of this year, said: "We are facing headwinds from weak industry refining margins, and the security situation in Nigeria."
But he said the company's flow of projects for 2014 and beyond was strong.
The company announced a third quarter dividend of $0.45 per ordinary share, up 5%, from 43 cents in the third quarter 2012.
Royal Dutch Shell A shares closed down 5%, 107.5p, at £20.765.
BP highlighted pressure on refining margins when it announced better than expected third quarter results on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article