The impact of oil theft and supply disruption in Nigeria were among the factors which caused Royal Dutch Shell to post a "clearly disappointing" 20% drop in profits.
The oil giant also blamed higher costs, exploration charges and exchange rates for the decline in underlying earnings to £3 billion in the quarter to June 30, from £3.8 billion a year earlier.
It said the challenges in Nigeria, where oil theft and disruption to gas supplies is causing widespread environmental damage, could cost the country's government £7.9 billion in lost revenues per year.
Chief executive Peter Voser said: "We will play our part, but these are problems Shell cannot solve alone."
Shares fell 4% as Mr Voser added: "These results were undermined by a number of factors - but they were clearly disappointing for Shell."
He has been chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell since July 2009 but is leaving at the end of this year in order to spend more time with his family. He will be replaced by downstream director Ben van Beurden.
The outgoing chief executive said Shell was entering a period of substantial portfolio change as it sells assets and invests in new capacity with greater potential. It has five major start-ups due in the next 18 months that should add more than £2.6 billion to its 2015 cash flow.
Shell has been present in Nigeria since 1936, but in recent years production has been blighted by militant attacks, including in the western Niger Delta.
It recently announced the potential exit from interests it holds in some onshore leases in the eastern part of the Niger Delta.
The deteriorating operating environment in Nigeria had an impact on production volumes, cutting the equivalent of 100 thousand barrels of oil in the second quarter. Across the business, production was 3,062,000 barrels, down 1% on a year earlier.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article