ShareSoc, the private shareholder group claiming to speak for 10per cent of small stock market investors, has backed the challenge to Alliance Trust from its activist shareholder Elliott Advisors.
Roger Lawson, ShareSoc deputy chairman, accused Alliance of a rapid and "intemperate" response to Elliott late last week, when the trust dismissed proposals for three new non-executives as "completely unacceptable", igniting a war of words with its 12 per cent shareholder.
Mr Lawson said the key issues were the trust's reported 14.6 per cent discount before Elliott's move, which was "too high for such a non-specialist trust", and the total share price return, which was below sector average over one, three, five and 10 years.
"Although there was some improvement in the last year, this seems to have partly arisen from special circumstances related to their private equity and mineral rights investments. In essence the performance has been pedestrian for many years."
ShareSoc says Elliott's reported past suggestion of a tender offer is "perfectly understandable" but with self-managed trusts such as Alliance there can be "reluctance to downsize the company".
The nominated directors appeared to be independent and under company law would have to consider only the interests of the trust when on the board, it added.
ShareSoc says shareholders should vote in favour of the proposed directors unless Alliance comes up with stronger arguments. "Their rejection of the proposals out of hand seems unwise and unfortunately a typical response from boards who are reluctant to tackle the key issues when faced by criticism from outside."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article