THE age of unconventional hydrocarbons has arrived in Scotland with news that Scottish and Southern Energy has done a deal worth up to £300 million with a company that extracts gas out of deep coal seams.
Dart Energy has signed the five-year deal to supply Scotia Gas Networks with methane that it expects to extract from its 329sqkm acreage near Airth in Stirlingshire using a system called coal bed methane (CBM) extraction. Scotia, which supplies gas to Scotland and southern England, is owned by SSE and two Canadian pension funds. It is the first such deal of its kind in Scotland, coming on the back of a similar operation by another company called IGas Energy in Warrington. CBM and the controversial extraction of shale oil and gas are likely to become more common as North Sea gas reserves run low over the next decade.
The deal, which aims to start producing gas from next year, is the culmination of seven years of exploration by Stirling-based Composite Energy, which owned the licence until it was taken over by Dart earlier this year. Dart, which is based in Singapore and listed in Australia, is a global specialist in CBM.
CBM involves drilling into coal seams at depths of 4000 feet and removing water, which unlocks trapped methane. It has been controversial in the US, where it now provides 7% of natural gas, because it involves a process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which involves pumping water and chemicals into seams at high pressures to help with extraction by fracturing formations. This is said to carry serious environmental risks such as contaminating ground water and bringing hazardous waste to the surface. The process is banned in France and is being reviewed by the German and UK Governments. For CBM in Europe, however, fracking is inappropriate because coal seams are much thinner.
Having said that, fracking is appropriate in Europe for extracting so-called shale gas and oil. The difference between shale gas and CBM is that the gases are trapped in sandstone instead of coal seams, at depths that can be up to twice that of CBM.
Dart is due to start drilling for shale hydrocarbons in its Stirlingshire acreage in the coming weeks in a joint venture with oil and gas giant, BG. Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie tabled a question in Parliament last week asking whether fracking should be allowed in Scotland and for details of meetings in the past year between the Scottish Government and Dart Energy.
Ed Cox, a gas specialist at consultancy ICIS Heren, said the 1.2 billion cubic metres (bcm) of CBM reserves at the Airth acreage and the maximum predicted extraction rate of close to one million cubic metres per day were the equivalent of a moderate gas field offshore.
He said: “The price this winter is about 70p, but over the past three years it’s been between 20p and 40p. But the more relevant price is what it will cost to get out of the ground, which they might not be able to justify unless the market price is high.”
Cox added: “There’s been a lot of noise, but no evidence so far that it’s going to have a big impact on the national network. There are doubts whether these local discoveries will ever be anything more than a regional top-up to a power station or local system.”
Dart chief executive Simon Potter recently said: “The gas sales agreement put in place... comes a month after the first [proven] reserves were independently assessed and means we expect to see first cash flows in the UK in early 2013.”
Sandy Wito, fuel procurement manager at SSE, said: “The link-up with Dart Energy provides an innovative opportunity to make use of onshore gas supplies that might otherwise be stranded. Alongside new contracts with European partners via interconnectors, it will help SSE further diversify its approach to fuel procurement.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article