Banks are seeking to "water down" the restitution due to small businesses mis-sold interest rate hedging products, the campaign group Bully Banks has claimed.
The group said it feared the redress scheme now being managed by the Financial Conduct Authority, although still in its early stages, would allow banks to exploit mis-selling victims.
Bully Banks said it was stepping up its activities due to concern over "continuing failure by many of the banks' senior managers to accept responsibility for their bank's actions and fears that banks have been successful in watering down the cost of restitution and justice".
It said the signs were that banks might look to offer businesses alternative "swap" based loans, of a smaller size or shorter term, replacing their existing toxic product with a "baby-toxic" one.
The campaign group said it was also "seeking confirmation that banks were prevented from stipulating gagging orders on any settlements agreed pursuant to or in place of the scheme" and for a wide range of losses to be taken into account when assessing losses.
It is also highlighting inconsistencies in the review process where, for example, HSBC is refusing to offer face-to-face meetings.
Jeremy Roe, chairman of Bully Banks which has 1200 SME members, said: "Having won the upfront battle in establishing the principle of mis-selling there is real concern small businesses could lose the war, and fail to obtain the full and fair restitution due." He added: "We still do not know what redress means, 10 months after the Financial Services Authority announced the agreement with the banks."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article