GORDON DAVIDSON
SCOTTISH BEEF deserves an early upgrade to the highest possible health status because its herd has been BSE-free since 2002 – even if that upgrade means leaving English and Welsh beef years behind - wholesalers say.
The Scottish Association of Meat Wholesalers this week requested a meeting with the Scottish Secretary for Rural Economy, Fergus Ewing, to examine the case for Scotland being moved from its current 'controlled risk' status to the altogether more appealing 'negligible risk' bracket.
SAMW pointed out that the last confirmed BSE case in Scotland involved an animal born in 2002, which contrasts with the last confirmed BSE case in Great Britain having involved an animal born in 2009.
The wholesalers argue that Scotland’s ‘all-clear’ seven-year advantage should be recognised by the prompt granting of negligible risk status for the country’s livestock, rather than having to wait until England and Wales qualify for their upgrade in four years’ time, according to current projections. Northern Ireland is also seeking a move into the ‘negligible risk’ bracket due to its equally impressive all-clear record.
“We have asked the Cabinet Secretary for a meeting to discuss our BSE status as soon as possible,” said SAMW president, Allan Jess. “We believe the case for Scotland moving to ‘negligible risk’ is extremely strong, based on our BSE record, and would hope the Cabinet Secretary will support us in raising our status to the highest possible level in the shortest time possible.”
SAMW said that it had presented Mr Ewing with a detailed analysis of the market, economic and whole-chain benefits which would result from a move to ‘negligible risk’ status.
The key benefits it identified included the reputational gain from enhancing the Scottish product's already disease-free image, which in turn would help with the removal of obstacles when negotiating access to new markets, particularly in the most lucrative global markets,
In markets where some trade already existed, the negligible risk tag would make for easier access, and give Scotland a deserved trading advantage over competitors from ‘controlled risk’ countries, and equal trading status with other ‘negligible risk countries.
Of keen interest to the abattoir sector would be the long-awaited escape from costly Specified Risk Materials removal procedures, and reduction of the associated SRM disposal costs, which would, said SAMW, mean better returns for other links in the supply chain.
“Scotland’s meat and livestock industry is already perceived abroad as having a clean healthy image and producing wholesome high quality produce,” said Mr Jess. “This image has been enhanced in recent years through our achieving of TB free status and BVD free status, resulting in significant benefits in accessing new export markets and capturing new customers in existing markets.
“While it’s difficult to place a precise financial value on the benefit to Scotland’s image of gaining the desired ‘negligible risk’ BSE status, we believe it would be substantial," he said. "The major meat export plants in Scotland, for example, have indicated that gaining ‘negligible risk’ would be a significant key to unlocking the gate to new third country opportunities.
“In seeking to address this issue with the Cabinet Secretary, therefore, SAMW is optimistic that, by working together, we can unlock some important and valuable markets to the all-round benefit of Scotland’s livestock and meat industry.”
For in-depth news and views on Scottish agriculture, see this Friday’s issue of The Scottish Farmer or visit www.thescottishfarmer.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here