CHRISTIAN Porta, chief executive of whisky company Chivas Brothers, has hit out at the Scottish Government for being "more about promoting headlines" than engaging with the drinks industry as the row over minimum pricing rolls on.
Mr Porta believes minimum pricing, which will push the price of a bottle of 40% whisky up to a minimum of £14, is an "illegal" and "dangerous" policy.
He told The Herald: "We get the impression this Government is more about promoting headline grasping, and measures like minimum unit pricing which we do not believe is going to have an effect, than working with the industry."
Mr Porta's comments carry weight because Chivas Brothers is part of Pernod Ricard, the world's second largest spirits group, and has 15 distilleries and two bottling plants in Scotland. His comments also threatens to undermine Scottish Government efforts to position itself as a backer of the whisky industry as a key export industry.
Mr Porta, who has run Chivas for the past eight years, sits on the ruling council of the Scotch Whisky Association, which, The Herald reported yesterday, is seeking to "marshal opposition" to minimum pricing in the European institutions.
Mr Porta said: "We believe [minimum pricing] is going to be ineffective. It is not going to solve the problem of excessive consumption by a minority of the population. We believe it is illegal."
With 93% of production exported, worth £4.23 billion in 2011, the industry says there is a risk other countries will seek to erect barriers to whisky imports under the guise of following Scotland's lead in health protection.
Mr Porta: "It will give plenty of bad ideas to people in other countries."
The Scottish Government for its part has argued that minimum pricing is legally justified on public health grounds. A spokeswoman said: "We have had continual dialogue with the alcohol industry on minimum pricing.
"We believe it to be the best way of tackling Scotland's unhealthy relationship with alcohol.
"We consider minimum pricing does comply with European law, provided it is justified on public health and social grounds."
Mr Porta said Pernod has no objection to Scottish Government plans to lower the threshold for drink-driving.
Pernod, he added, has "no opinion" on independence for Scotland. Asked if the prospect of the 2014 referendum is affecting Chivas's investment decisions, he said: "For the time being, no."
In 2011, whisky production in Scotland bounced back to pre-financial crisis levels to some 354 million litres of pure alcohol.
Chivas plans to boost its malt whisky spirit production by 25% to 60 million litres a year by expanding production at its Glentauchers, Tormore, Glenallichie and Longmorn distilleries and reopening Glen Keith where new equipment is being installed.
Mr Porta is bullish about the prospects for the whisky industry and for Pernod brands such as Chivas Regal, Ballantine's and Royal Salute in emerging markets such as China and Latin America. He told The Herald that Africa is another potential whisky market if spirits giants can convert some existing beer drinkers.
"Africa is very largely untapped territory for Scotch whisky," he said. He identified Nigeria, Kenya, Morocco and Angola as possible targets. Mr Porta acknowledged there are global "economic risks" that could hamper the company's growth plans. However, he played down the chances of a meltdown in the eurozone.
"If Greece leaves the euro, which isn't necessarily the most likely scenario, there is a risk there is a contagion effect on Spain, Portugal, Italy," he said. "Is that the most likely scenario? No. Could it happen? Yes, it could."
He said that Pernod has already significantly shrunk its operation in Greece. He added: "If Spain leaves the euro, which is a very, very unlikely scenario, what would happen? We have no idea."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article