Thousands of bond, currency and commodities traders in London should have to pass an exam and obtain a new qualification to trade as part of attempts to raise standards, Britain's bank lobby group said on Wednesday.
The British Bankers' Association (BBA) said a "licence to trade" qualification and tougher codes of conduct should be introduced to strengthen trust in financial markets after a series of damaging scandals.
The BBA said everyone involved in FICC (fixed income, currencies and commodities) markets should be required to pass exams and be professionally qualified, although the qualification wouldn't need to be the same for all markets.
"This is a once in a generation chance to clean up financial markets - we must seize it," BBA Chairman Anthony Browne said in the group's response to the Bank of England and UK government's Fair and Effective Market Review.
The government initiated a review of how to clean up the industry after Britain's banks were caught up in a series of trading scandals.
"Restoring trust to financial markets is hugely important to the banking industry in the UK," said Mr Browne.
The BBA said proposals to increase individual accountability for senior managers should be extended to include all bank staff, excluding those in retail banking and those in support roles such as reception, security and cleaning.
Bank of England Deputy Governor Minouche Shafik has said tougher rules may be needed to stop the "anything goes" attitude of traders uncovered in recent investigations. .
Shafik said last month the review would look at how to give teeth to industry codes of conduct, such as by making them mandatory.
"We are trying to get at the individuals," Shafik said, as regulators seek to meet criticism from lawmakers that too few bankers, rather than firms, have been brought to book for reckless behaviour in the run up to the financial crisis.
The review is due to make recommendations in June and likely to focus on bolstering codes, as much of the legislative work is already in the pipeline at the European Union level.
The public consultation on the review closed last Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article