Companies will be measured against a corporate government index in the next stage of work by the Institute of Directors with Cass Business School.
Following a research report into UK governance, the IoD says it has "set itself the task of ultimately creating a robust index that does not encourage box-ticking and will stay reliable as the economy and business change over time".
The research panel looked at factors including business performance, audit arrangements, directors' pay and shareholder relations, and undertook a survey of business people's perceptions of the UK's biggest companies, the IoD says.
"In a new approach, the panel then combined this information in an attempt to achieve a more impartial and deeper understanding of the governance of these companies. This is an important step towards creating an index of listed companies which will aid investors and directors in their decision-making."
Ken Olisa, chairman of the advisory panel for the report, warned that it was wrong to rely on regulators, whose focus was inevitably on compliance, to improve governance. He said: "Identifying symptoms of governance failures, and then drawing up checklists to eradicate them leaves us in the position of always fighting the last battle. The financial crisis was not caused by a lack of rules, it was caused by behaviour which was clearly egregious to any outside observer."
Simon Walker, director general of the IoD, said: "This report challenges previous ways of measuring the governance of big companies, and kicks off a new debate on how firms can improve their transparency, accountability and performance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article