Most of our share tips managed to keep on an even keel in last week's choppy stock markets with the overall value of our four portfolios showing a small gain at our review on Wednesday morning.
There were some disappointments along the way and we sold our notional holding in F&C Asset Management when its share price tumbled to its published stop/loss level following the recent resignation of chairman Edward Bramson.
It was our third disposal in the past fortnight after the evictions of Scottish firms Aberdeen Asset Management and John Wood Group, which had also triggered sell signals under the stop/loss system.
We could be forced to sell more in coming weeks with property group Grainger and Legal & General showing signs of coming off the boil, and Barclays and Greggs still trading below our purchase prices.
As things stand, we already hold more than £19,000 in cash - roughly half the valuation of the four portfolios - which is available for reinvestment when share prices show signs of stabilising.
This could be particularly useful if the Government presses ahead with the planned flotation of the Post Office on generous terms or the public is tapped for cash to buy shares in Lloyds Banking. We are already due to pay out a modest £150 to take up new shares in Barclays' big fundraising issue - provided the current price does not fall to our stop/loss figure first.
The F&C performance last week saw the 2013 portfolio slip to a loss of just more than 1% but that was balanced by a 1.6% gain for the 2012 list where all four remaining constituents managed small rises.
The 2010 and 2011 selections both ended with their overall values virtually unchanged.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article