Half-year results from online retailer Ocado come after the group's recent coup in securing a 25-year, £170 million deal with Morrisons to enable the supermarket to sell food on the web.
The move angered its largest supplier and rival Waitrose, which has since appointed lawyers to study the agreement between Morrisons and Ocado. But it was applauded by investors, sending shares rocketing to an all-time high of 351p in May and defying doubters of the group.
Ocado, which employs around 6000 people, also said in May it had seen a strong start to the year, setting the scene for a decent set of interim results. Underlying earnings are expected to rise by a fifth to £18.1m in the first half, thanks to a forecast rise in net revenues to £355.8m.
The group is predicted to sink into the red on a pre-tax basis, with £2.4m of losses after notching up £400,000 in underlying profits a year earlier.
Government support for the housing market should help housebuilder Persimmon report more strong growth when it updates on recent trading on Tuesday. Britain's housebuilders have been on a roll in recent months, boosted by state stimulus aimed at getting more people on the housing ladder and spurring a construction recovery.
That has underpinned a share price surge which recently returned the York-based company to the FTSE 100 Index after a five-year absence. In April Persimmon said more potential buyers have been flocking to its developments and websites, and the City expects this interest to translate into higher sales and reservations.
Fellow housebuilder Taylor Wimpey is also set to confirm improving market conditions when it updates on trading on Thursday.
The Buckinghamshire-based company has seen rising reservations as Government stimulus drives a housing market recovery. By April its total order book was up 18% to £1.2bn over the same time in 2012, with prices and margins improving.
Analysts expect the builder to report more growth – and Citigroup believes it could even be close to returning money to shareholders. They said: "We expect the group to continue to make good progress with margins."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article