THE worry with the restructuring of the Co-operative Bank was always that, when the Co-op Group's stake was reduced to a minority, its ethical identity would be diminished.
Unfortunately, the early signs are that this is exactly what is happening.
The solution to its admittedly many problems is depressingly familiar: throw lots of money at senior executives and cut back on front-line staff.
The Co-op somehow sees it as appropriate to hand chief executive Niall Booker a £140,000 a month allowance, enough to employ half a dozen cashiers for a year, on top of the £1.2 million annual salary he is given for actually doing the job.
Meanwhile, 1000 jobs have been lost at the institution and about 40 branches will close this year.
Those staff members who remain fear for their posts.
Mr Booker yesterday made all the right noises about Co-op Bank's commitment to its ethical roots.
So far it seems that most customers are sticking with the company despite its effective control by a group of hedge funds.
This probably says more about the lack of competition on the high street than it does about the Co-op Bank.
There are few places to turn for customers who want an alternative to the plc model and a commitment to lending only to the ethically sound.
Co-op Bank will be consulting on its ethical policy this spring. It can only be hoped that this sparks a renewed commitment to such values.
The institution must be rescued, but should it really be at any price?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article