Banks seeking to rebuild consumer trust could do worse than looking to the next generation.
But many of the savings accounts for children and young people on offer in the high street show that banks don't treat them any better than they treat adults.
The terms and conditions of a children's account can be even trickier than those of adult versions. There might be restrictions on withdrawals, or a bonus that pushes up the interest rate, but only for a limited period. And try not to get too distracted by the various freebies.
Royal Bank of Scotland is 83% owned by the taxpayer and is keen to promote a new community-minded image. It has a typical kids' offering including a moneybox and a magazine for ages seven to 10, but the savings rate on offer is an underwhelming 0.5%. When the child turns 11, it's the Rainbow Savings account – but the rate doesn't improve. The Revolve account for up to the age of 18 does have a debit card, but the rate jumps by a feeble 0.05% to 0.55%.
Santander has two youth accounts, and one for the children of eligible customers pays an attractive 4.89%. But the rate drops to just 0.1% once £500 of savings are reached, which may make the free gift for opening the account look expensive.
Among the "ethical" alternatives, the Co-operative's two accounts pay just 0.25%, Triodos Bank offers 0.8%, and the Dunfermline building society, part of the giant Nationwide society, has two accounts with piggy banks and magazines, but pays only 0.75%. The Nationwide itself pays 0.75%, or 2.1% with 90-day notice, and has a one-year bond paying an unspectacular 2.25%.
Even with inflation falling last month to 2.4%, it still means youngsters' savings are losing value fast in these accounts.
So although it's a good idea to get children into the habit of saving from an early age, what kind of lesson are you teaching your little (or bigger) ones if you put their money into an account that pays a poor rate of interest?
Honourable banking exceptions are the Young Saver, paying 2% at Bank of Scotland but a far better 3% at Lloyds TSB in the same banking group – though only if the parent has a Lloyds TSB account.
The popular regular saver account launched by Bank of Scotland and still paying 6% is now available only in Halifax branches south of the Border. But out in front is Northern Rock's Little Saver, beating inflation at 3% with no strings attached. As with many accounts, the adult must be named as trustee, and this one has a limit of £10,000.
Clydesdale has this month launched two new kids' accounts. Jumpstart pays up to 0.55% (over £1000), similar to the bank's previous Cybersave offering though now throwing in free gifts and a "dual function" cashcard for over-11s, with parental consent. Headstart, says the bank, "allows parents to put away money to help towards the cost of going to university, buying a first car or home or just to give their children a financial helping hand". Like the Junior Isa, control of the account passes to the young person, though on their 17th not 18th birthday. But despite the innovations, the interest rate is nothing to write home about. The 2.5% headline offer includes a bonus of 1%, which means just 1.5% from October 2013, and there is also a 95-day notice period for withdrawals.
Alternatives are available from two mutuals. The Skipton's Leap account does have a 0.5% bonus, but the rate settles after 12 months at 2.25% and there are no other strings, while the Scottish Building Society offers the best regular savings account of its kind in the market. The uAccount for ages seven to 17 pays 4% on £10 to £100 a month, and allows one withdrawal a year – though the rate falls to 2% if fewer than 12 payments or more than one withdrawal are made.
The "best buy" tables show the (Welsh) Principality building society's Dylan Regular Saver Bond as the top-paying children's account. But while it pays 4.5% fixed for 12 months as long as you make a monthly deposit of between £10 and £150, this account then reverts to a feeble rate of 0.9%.
The Clydesdale's Child Savings Bond is a longer-term proposition. It is a five-year fixed-rate bond allowing just one deposit, and it is still paying 4.25% – a better rate than most regular five-year bonds on the market.
An adult will often have to open any account in the child's name and it may have an age limit of 16. You should fill out form R85 to make sure the interest on the account is paid gross. Watch out for the £100 rule, though. If the money in the account is given by a parent, any interest over £100 is taxed as the parent's own.
Anyone who is worried about a potential tax bill might want to consider a Junior cash Isa. You can put up to £3600 a year into a Jisa and the interest is tax-free. However, the money is locked up until the young person hits 18 – and then the accumulated pot passes to them. If that doesn't put you off, the rates on offer for Jisas are juicier than those in the kids' accounts market. Nationwide and Coventry (both paying 3.25%) and Skipton (3.02%) are a nose ahead of Bank of Scotland and Lloyds TSB (both 3%), while the tiny Scottish pays a game 2.6%.
Mandy Armes had no hesitation in opening savings accounts for sons Lucas, eight, and four-year-old Aiden with the Skipton Building Society. She and husband Matthew chose the Leap account, with a competitive rate and ready access, rather than the higher-paying junior Isa. She says: "I like the savings account, because if they did need anything we would be able to use it rather than break into other accounts." The couple pay in Christmas and birthday gifts and make other deposits too. "It is all there for future purposes," Armes says, adding that Skipton has been "honest and upfront" since she reviewed her savings four years ago and switched to them from her bank.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article