LONDON was probably the only part of the UK to enjoy a rise in consumer spending between 2006 and 2012 in real terms, but Scotland likely managed to stand still on this measure while every-where else suffered a fall.
These are the conclusions of a study by respected consultancy Capital Economics, which estimates average, inflation-adjusted growth of consumer spending in London between 2006 and 2012 at 0.7% per annum.
Explaining London's outperformance of other parts of the UK, in terms of consumer spending during a period which takes in the deep 2008/09 downturn and double-dip recession between October 2011 and June 2012, Capital says in its latest UK Cities & Regions Focus study: "This particularly reflected growth in the financial, professional and digital sectors, boosting employment and particularly pay."
It adds: "These sectors are now facing some challenges in London, but any difficulties are likely to be overcome, and consumer spending in the capital should continue to outperform the rest of the UK over the next four years."
Giving its view that Scotland fared second-best in the UK in terms of consumer spending, London-based Capital adds: "Although not exactly a strong performance (by London), this is clearly better than our estimates of what other regions managed to achieve.
"It is likely that, in every other region, consumer spending declined in real terms, or was flat in the case of Scotland."
Capital noted the fact that Edinburgh, like London, had a concentration of financial services activity, but cited its belief that this was too small to make a "huge impact" on the overall pattern of the Scottish economy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article