The owner of high street fashion giant Zara has become the latest retailer to take a weather hit after the unusually warm autumn left it nursing lower-than-expected sales and profits.
Spanish parent group Inditex saw like-for-like sales growth slow to 3% in the six months to the end of November after an "extraordinarily warm September", although growth bounced back to 5% in October and November.
The world's largest clothing retailer chose not to cut prices of clothing since September, unlike rivals who sought to offset the hit to demand for autumn ranges.
Shares in Inditex fell more than 4% after it missed forecasts with a 3% rise in group net sales over the first nine months of 2018 and a 4% increase in net profits to 2.4 billion euros (£2.2 billion).
It comes after British clothing label Superdry also warned over annual profits after an unseasonably warm weather dented sales of jackets and winter clothing.
Inditex said: "The company decided not to participate in the promotional activity widely seen in the sector since September."
This tactic helped protect profit margins at Inditex, although its figures revealed the toll taken by a weaker euro.
Nine-month net sales were 7% higher with currency effects stripped out.
It added that like-for-like sales were higher in all regions including the UK over the nine months.
The latest falls for Inditex shares come after a difficult year for the stock, which has dropped 9% since January.
But chairman and chief executive Pablo Isla cheered the group's "strong business model, which continues to deliver solid structural growth in all markets, along with our constant focus on developing the integrated store and online platform through continued enhancement of technology and systems".
Inditex has 7,422 stores in 96 markets and its ranges can be bought online in 202 markets worldwide.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here