There's something odd going on at the BBC and I can't decide if the cause of it is institutional ineptness, deliberate provocation, or something more insidious.
I've never been shy of banging on about the lack of women commentators on Newsnight Scotland. All too often, we get an all bloke affair: I've lost count of the number of times this has happened and it was only after concerted criticism that a fleeting attempt was made to rectify matters.
Indeed, we even had one programme where every single person involved was a woman. Imagine.
Then, we had the stushie caused by the London lot, firstly in that not a single woman was deemed worthy of being shortlisted for Sports Personality of the Year. Make no mistake, the only winner could have, should have been Mark Cavendish, the cyclist from the Isle of Man. His achievements in 2011 were outstanding,but he also deserved to win, because unlike most of the other nominees, he actually has a personality.
But to invite the male-dominated world of sports journalism and to throw in a few lads' mags to boot to determine the shortlist beggars belief. And to then allow a shortlist to be created that does not contain a single woman, thereby explicitly indicating that no woman is worthy of the honour, was frankly shocking.
The BBC wasn't finished yet. It published a list of its female faces of the year for 2011 which managed to include several victims of crime or inappropriate male behaviour, a princess, a duchess, a popstar, a fallen angel, a fairytale dress designer (for a princess, natch), and a soldier who went on a date with a popstar. Oh, and a panda.
The only woman included in the list for doing something empowering was the black woman who challenged the looters and rioters in London in the summer.
The commentariat went doolally over the inclusion of "Sweetie", the female panda to arrive from China to form one half of Edinburgh's latest visitor attraction.
But take all the slights practised on one half of the population of the British isles by the state broadcaster together and it should be causing brows to furrow and explanations to be sought.
Ignoring for one moment that women pay the same licence fee as men do, and also setting aside the fact that as a public body the BBC is bound by the same sort of equality duties as local councils and the NHS, at any level, how can this inability to represent women fairly and equally in a whole host of ways be appropriate?
The way in which women are portrayed and treated in the media matters. It matters that women are looked over or not sought out to provide comment or analysis of the big news stories of the day in Scotland; it matters that the achievement of sportswomen is ignored, particularly when we know there is a gender deficit in sporting participation among young people (girls after about the age of 13 opt out much more than boys); and it matters that the state broadcaster thinks it appropriate to provide a list of female faces of the year that hardly any women using their intelligence and talents to achieve extraordinary things that make our community, society and world a better place to live in.
Is there a glass ceiling in place that prevents women participating in the decision making on areas like this? Have cuts done for the ability of internal influencers to make thoughtful and meaningful decisions?
Does nobody join up individual decisions to see the sum of the parts? Has everyone just got very lazy? Are the managers being deliberately provocative (after all, it's got people talking about the BBC)?
Or is there institutional sexism operating at the heart of the state broadcaster?
Whatever the reason, an inquiry is due. The BBC at UK and regional (sic) level must be held accountable for its actions and decisions to exclude, humiliate and belittle one half of the population it was set up to serve.
An audit would be useful - let's flush out just how many women there are in the different spheres that comprise the Beeb who have any influence.
We know about the ones who make it to the top and who are trotted out to show how squeaky clean the broadcaster is on equal opps, but what about the rungs of the ladder that are hidden from view?
This is a job for the House of Commons culture, sport and media committee. Louise Mensch, the Conservative MP, has experienced sexism from the media firsthand: of all people, she should realise how important it is to shake out all the pieces of this puzzle, with a view to finding a better fit.
Better still, the men on that committee, who of course outnumber the women, should lead the charge. The last thing we want is for the BBC's problem with women becoming seen and then dismissed as a women's issue.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article