Smart phones, tablets and laptops are now part of everyday life for many people.
But how many of us are aware that materials used in our modern technology are fuelling wars, violence and rape in many already extremely poor countries?
Minerals such as coltan, tungsten, tin, gold and tantalum - which are all used in electronic devices - often come from developing countries with little regard for the millions of people whose lives are adversely affected by the trade.
In Colombia, illegal armed groups benefit from the trade in minerals, with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) estimated to raise perhaps up to 20 per cent of its funds from Colombia's gold trade.
Father Sterlin Londoño, from the Diocese of Quibdo in Colombia, helps communities that have been driven from their land during the country's long-running civil war. Conflict over the land for mining is fuelling instability and violence.
Fr Sterlin told us: "In principle, it is okay to mine. Natural resources can be used to benefit all of mankind and communities here have been undertaking small-scale, traditional mining for decades.
"But any mining must take place only with the full and informed consent of the communities who live on the land ... Losing the land will mean losing everything; their home, their source of food and work, their very way of life."
In the eastern regions of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the trade in minerals is causing widespread abuse of human rights including murder and rape.
Rebel militias and the army have made millions through illegal taxation and control of the trade, while inflicting appalling suffering on local people.
Teresa Mapenzi, one of Sciaf's partners, helps women and girls affected by sexual violence in South Kivu. She told us: "The rebels come to the village at night and people are taken hostage. Men are forced to mine coltan and gold, and women are used as sexual slaves and cooks.
"There is no control from the authorities. Some even profit from the trade. Minerals from conflict areas are cheaper. But buying minerals from conflict areas fuels conflict and finances war.
"European companies should source materials in good ways. If things are done in a way that respects human rights and women's dignity we can reduce this problem."
The global trade in these minerals was worth more than €125 billion in 2013, with the European Union (EU) responsible for almost one quarter of that.
Yet there is no EU law requiring companies to ensure the minerals they use have not funded violence.
The European Commission has proposed a voluntary self-certification scheme, but Sciaf and others are campaigning for them to go much further.
The range of companies covered by the law must be broadened to include those that import components and finished products into the EU.
The materials covered should also include any that are mined or come from trade that may contribute to human rights abuses and conflict.
We are urging people in Scotland to lobby their MEPs to help strengthen European legislation before a key vote on the proposed legislation takes place next week.
I would encourage everyone to visit our website and ask their MEPs to ensure that strong EU legislation helps control trade in these minerals.
Sciaf has seen the devastation caused by the deadly trade in conflict minerals in many places. It's time we all knew where the materials in our smart phones, laptops and other electronic devices come from.
Only then can we be sure that we're not supporting war, violence against women, or the widespread abuse of human rights.
Alistair Dutton is the Director of the Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund (Sciaf).
To take action and find out more, visit www.sciaf.org.uk/campaigns
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article