Earlier this year I signalled my intention to start a wide-ranging debate on the future of our health service over the next 10 to 15 years.
The aim is to look beyond short-term demands and foster a consensus around how we best manage our NHS to ensure it meets the considerable challenges of the future.
Our caring services must be designed around people and patients, not the buildings they're treated in. Prevention must also be a vital part of the debate on the future.
Signalling our intent to have that debate reflects how the Scottish Government wants to do business.
My belief is the consensus must be built on the agreement we already have in Scotland that the NHS should remain publicly-owned, publicly-run, and free at the point of need.
On that basis, positive ideas will be welcome, no matter where they come from.
That is why I was encouraged by the recent statement from professionals in our health service at the RCN and Royal Colleges, calling for a public conversation on the long term future of our NHS.
It was a considered contribution and this government will listen closely to these key professional bodies - as should all politicians.
One of the main calls from the professional bodies was to rethink targets. We're listening to these calls, and share the same view that we must have the right targets.
The number of targets has reduced dramatically over the last decade - from 200 in 2005 to 20 in 2015.
And targets are important in driving improvements in the NHS, such as ensuring people have consistently quick access to cancer treatment.
That is why this cannot just be a discussion between clinicians and politicians. We must also listen to members of the public.
We'll do that throughout the summer and beyond. I hope we can reach a broad consensus on principles and future direction of travel by the autumn.
This isn't an easy, or a quick piece of work. It deserves time and serious debate.
However, while we must consider the future of our health service, we should not lose sight of how far we've come.
Substantial improvements under this government have led to historically low waiting times, large reductions in infection rates in our hospitals, and delivery of some of the most high quality and safe healthcare anywhere in the world.
Our NHS now has record staffing and record funding. We're bringing health and social care together to work closer with each other than ever before. And we have a clear focus on our 2020 vision for the NHS - which is starting a fundamental shift to more preventative healthcare and care into the community.
All that has been achieved while our budget has been consistently been cut by the UK Government - with fresh cuts to our overall spending already confirmed for this year which could total upwards of £170 million at the hands of the Chancellor.
In these circumstances there is no doubt that just like across most of the western world, there are pressures on our system.
It should be acknowledged The Herald has been a strong advocate of this need for discussion and positive change.
We want to see fresh emphasis on care delivered in the community, by multi-professional teams, which best meets patient needs. The solution needs to involve all professions and everywhere we deliver care, from care in your home, through primary care and GPs and right up to the acute care delivered in major hospitals.
We have already begun work to renew our focus on primary care - both in and out of hours - and we want to engage the public in developing a new model of primary care which provides better access for patients, and can address the recruitment and retention problems GPs face.
To make these ideas reality, we will need agreement and support across professions and the public.
While we may not agree on every point across the political spectrum on all of these issues, I am confident, that with shared positive intentions, we can build consensus. I hope to work with the Health Committee at the Parliament to make that happen.
Our NHS is something I know we all treasure. We all have a stake in it and we all deserve our say on its future. I look forward to engaging in and leading the conversation, so we can protect our NHS for generations to come.
Shona Robison is Cabinet Secretary for Health, Wellbeing and Sport.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article