A REGULAR dilemma for Scottish journalists covering General Elections post-1997 is remembering which aspects of government are devolved and which are reserved to Westminster.
In other words, what issues are relevant to Scots as they cast their votes on May 7.
This is particularly true of transport policy, the bulk of which is now controlled by ministers at Holyrood - or more often, in the hands of local authorities.
So if your gripe is with poor bus provision, ferry fares or cycling infrastructure, next month's ballot box is null and void.
But that does not mean the outcome of the UK General Election is irrelevant to Scotland when it comes to transport matters.
High-speed rail, regional airports' access to a UK hub, and a demanded shake-up of rail franchising were among the topics on the agenda at a recent hustings in Glasgow.
Moreover, Westminster will decide where to locate the proposed UK spaceport - an outcome Scotland has a disproportionate interest given that four of the six shortlisted sites are found north of the Border.
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency, also reserved, has undergone reforms in the past five years which saw both the Forth and Clyde Coastguard stations closed - a process which MPs sitting on the Transport Select Committee said was "rushed and poorly planned".
Westminster is also responsible for setting the driving test, which the Institute of Advanced Motorists recently said fails to prepare learners for country roads - a particular worry for Scotland where the rural north-east and Borders have among the highest incidence of road deaths and serious injuries than anywhere in the UK.
So what differentiates the parties on transport?
Take HS2. Earlier this week Ed Milliband said Labour "absolutely supports" extending the high-speed rail link as far as Leeds despite previous comments by Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls questioning whether HS2 was "the best way to spend £50bn".
The Conservatives also back the move, while Deputy Prime Minister and LibDem leader Nick Clegg said last month that it would "finally address the North-South divide".
For Scots commuters it would shave around an hour off journeys from Scotland to London - but not until 2032.
The SNP would like something more ambitious: high-speed rail all the way from the Central Belt of Scotland to London, with concurrent construction projects building north to south and south to north, and eventually linking up.
So-called HS3 would cost the Scottish Government an estimated £10 billion.
While the other parties have made no concrete commitments, a Scotland extension won the backing of the Scottish Labour and Conservative panellists at the recent Glasgow transport hustings - though on the provision "if it happens, it must come to Scotland".
By contrast, the LibDem candidate said party policy would stop it south of the Border in favour of investment in northern Scotland's rail infrastructure.
Another major transport project with implications for Scotland is the expansion of either Heathrow or Gatwick, which - both airports insist - would boost connectivity from Scotland to London after years of dwindling services.
The Conservatives, Labour and the SNP all back extra runways in the south-east; the LibDems and Greens have vetoed extra runways for either airport.
Transport may not be a deal-breaker for most Scottish voters, but it isn't irrelevant either.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article