SPIES and all things related have always been sexy.
On television right now we have the new series of the espionage drama, Homeland, while our news headlines of late have been dominated by the controversy over the US National Security Agency's (NSA) surveillance operation. Short of James Bond and his creator Ian Fleming, Scotland is not immediately a place most people associate with the lofty issues of security and intelligence affairs.
Nothing, however, could be further from the truth. How interesting it is to find that amidst all the clamour over the forthcoming independence referendum, the issue of how Scotland might build its own domestic intelligence agency to combat security threats has become something of a hot issue.
It was in January that Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon told the Scottish Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs that such an agency would be founded should a Yes vote prevail. Such an agency, she said, would be there to serve the interests of the Scottish Government and people but inevitably maintain "very close intelligence-sharing with the rest of the UK".
Ms Sturgeon's remarks have subsequently elicited comment and provoked debate that most recently brought two former senior police officers to clash over the security implications of Scottish independence.
In the red corner, Labour MSP Graeme Pearson, a former director of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA), argued that effective working is easier with Scotland as part of the UK.
In the blue corner, however, Allan Burnett, previously counter-terrorism co-ordinator with the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (Acpos), dismissed Mr Pearson's concerns, insisting that "an excellent Scottish intelligence organisation could be developed in an independent country".
It is a fascinating debate, and one sure to be put under even greater scrutiny at a conference next week organised by Glasgow University's Global Security Network that was formed to bring together a wide range of academics with an interest in security issues.
Scotland, of course, has some renowned individuals and centres of excellence in relation to such subjects. To highlight just one example, St Andrew's University's Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence has established a worldwide reputation.
Among the themes to be explored at the Glasgow conference are: Intelligence and Security for an Independent Scotland and Scottish Secession: A Dangerous Precedent? The concluding round-table debate will focus on these issues within the context of the imminent independence White Paper to be launched later this month.
Making his recent case for a Scotland capable of creating its own intelligence organisation, Allan Burnett stressed the enormous depth of Scottish talent that already exists in the military, secret and police intelligence services. It was he said, "a great opportunity for an independent Scotland to do very much better". Personally, I couldn't agree more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article