IT seemed rather perverse, in this of all weeks, not to mention the referendum.
So that is what the first draft of this column was all about: my thoughts, such as they were, on this great, crucial, future-shaping vote that takes place tomorrow.
Rather pleased with it I was, too, even if it was, in the final analysis, strikingly devoid of insight, originality or even a conclusion.
Then - Ping! An email arrives from the editor.
"URGENT," it begins. "Do NOT mention the referendum in your column tomorrow.
"Please keep to some other subject. We've got the referendum coming out of our ears. We've written about virtually nothing else this month. As even you cannot fail to have noticed."
I re-read his email several times, hoping to detect in his words some tiny trace of ambiguity that would make it, after all, permissible for me to write about the referendum - this great, crucial, future-shaping vote that takes place tomorrow.
I email the editor to ask if his word is irretrievably final.
Ping! "Exactly what part of 'Do NOT mention the referendum' is unclear to you?" he responds.
I reply, in what, for me, are unusually persistent terms.
"Of course, I take your point," I write - soothingly, diplomatically. "It's just that the entire world is talking about the referendum this week. It seems a bit weird to overlook it entirely. Can't I just mention it, even briefly? Even via the silkiest and most nuanced of allusions?"
I hit 'send'.
Ping! "I SERIOUSLY do not have time for this," the editor replies, with what in retrospect seems to be some heat. "I am focusing all of my efforts, and those of my team, on the referendum and simply do not have time to babysit my columnists.
"You have literally thousands of subjects to choose from. Go away. Read the papers. Go online. Do what you always do. Write about anything you like."
Another Ping! follows two seconds later, as soon as he realises his mistake. "APART FROM THE REFERENDUM!"
I take a deep breath, and send one last e-mail. "Understood," I write. "You're the boss. Nothing about the referendum. Agreed?"
Reply comes there none.
But at least this week's column has not mentioned the referendum. Not once. I hope the editor will feel proud of me.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article