YOU may have noticed Barak Obama.
The President never goes anywhere without the United States flag permanently pinned to his lapel as a badge of pride. Even if the First Lady is straightening his black tie, it's there on his tuxedo and almost invariably Old Glory is in the backdrop to any official photo.
Even if your knowledge of the US is limited to television series such as CSI or Law & Order, you will be familiar with how ubiquitous the Stars and Stripes are in American life, appearing in every classroom and civic office.
Which is why I was dismayed to see the simple elegance of our most ancient of flags beginning to be over-used in our public life, including its adoption as a lapel badge by Government ministers. I always think lapel badges, like woggles, are for Boy Scouts rather than grown-ups; ditto flag obsessions generally.
But if you are going to have flags, you ought to be allowed to use them appropriately.
Not much of a cricket supporter, I attended the World Cup match between Scotland and Bangladesh in 1999 at Raeburn Place in Edinburgh, bumping into the Labour Minister Sam Galbraith, who eyed with evident distaste the Saltire I was carrying, appearing for all the world like the examiner looking at Holden Caulfield's exam paper in the Catcher in the Rye.
I recall thinking Mr Galbraith assumed I was "a Nat" whereas I thought I was at an international sporting fixture supporting Scotland and flags were not a matter of political correctness.
We can only presume that deep down David "Dave" Cameron agrees, as he turned up at the BMX biking event at the Olympics last year fully "Jacked up". Choosing an event that would make him look cool with the kids, he sat next to David Beckham and wore a British Olympics team polo shirt with the Union Flag on the arm before whipping out a larger version of the flag to celebrate a win.
So, when the Prime Minister said this week that the First Minister's brandishing of the Saltire last Sunday "didn't feel right" because it was "a day for sport, not politics" he was talking out the back of his Team GB polo shirt.
The real difference is that when Dave tries to play the punter he may not necessarily fool everyone. We know he is a posh Etonian.
Alex Salmond, on the other hand, has the priceless political gift of being able to transcend class – happy to make his voice a little more fruity as he debates with the London media elite or Nobel prize-winning economists as First Minister Salmond one minute, but effortlessly carrying off his role as Eck, tribune of the people with a voice from the terraces, the next.
His accents shifts around too, as befits the kind of everyman you get in towns the size of Linlithgow, where most folk send their bairns to the same school. But get this: it's easier for those of us with a working-class accent to posh up to our telephone voice than the opposite.
For Mr Salmond, it's one thing fewer to worry about as he effortlessly slips down the social register to speak to punters in their own language. When he goes on the stump in the next year, as he did in the Black Isle yesterday, it helps.
Whether at Hampden as a genuine football fan, or taking part in a pro-celeb golf match, what you see with Mr Salmond is what you get, and his chippy performance with the Saltire at Wimbledon is what you would expect.
As for the pledge by the hero of the hour, Andy Murray, to let us know his views on independence, my most friendly of advice would be not to bother. He took years to live down an innocent throwaway comment that he would be supporting "anyone but England" before a football World Cup.
I would welcome his views on the merits of the sliced backhand but I see no reason why his view on Holyrood taxation would be relevant, especially as his sponsors, advisers and other sundry money men may not want him to tell the truth. Keep it to yourself, Andy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article