CLARE'S LAW was one of the most supported pieces of legislation ever introduced at Holyrood.
Government, Opposition, other parties and pressure groups, all gathered in the Garden Lobby at the Scottish Parliament after its passage to say it was a grand idea.
We joined in, along with the rest of the media. The Herald backed the concept of a Clare's Law in Scotland, on the grounds that victims ought to be kept in the loop in all areas of the justice process.
But, remember, this legislation asked us to accept powers over something not normally granted in a democracy under the rule of law: The communication of information about an individual's criminal history, not just convictions but mere suspicions shelved by police or prosecutors.
We always accepted it was a difficult area. Someone may have a person in their background or even a stalker who made wrongful allegations. These were dismissed. But they were investigated. Under Clare's Law this worrying confirmation of suspicions might be fed back to the requester.
The Herald, with much reservation, has backed the application of Clare's Law, but we cannot pretend to see it as a panacea. It rides a coach and horses through concepts of innocent until guilty and quality of evidence.
But we backed it because we adjudged it to to be on balance something to combat a greater evil, which is the prevalence in our society of domestic violence. This, by definition happening behind closed doors, is difficult to charge, prosecute or convict.
Clare Wood, whose family was from Aberdeenshire, lived in Salford, Manchester, with her son when she met George Appleton on a dating website. He raped and strangled her, setting her body on fire. He had a string of previous convictions for sex offences and was part of a live investigation when he hanged himself.
But this was probably the wrong kind of case to use as the basis of new legislation, an extreme caricature of male violence which may tell us little of the complexities of the daily reality of abusive relationships. In short, this law had to be used with care, and the figures revealed today are encouraging.
To date there have been 33 requests for information from individuals in relationships, or their relatives and friends, about partners suspected of being abusive. Of these 22 have been through the decision-making process and six have been given information about whether their partners have a history of domestic violence.
That all sounds like a system which has moved swiftly from the swirl of legislation into a logical and constructive way of functioning, and it has been given a cautious welcome by Rape Crisis Scotland.
However, we agree with that organisation that this step can never represent a "be-all and end-all" and they key is support for those, primarily women, who find themselves trapped in the hell of domestic abuse. It matters little whether Clare's Law is in existence if those affected by domestic violence then have nowhere to turn to, no possibility of escape or assistance.
There's the rub. The unimaginable cruelty of someone trapped in a domestic relationship who is given the information under Clare's Law that their partner is indeed a monster, but has nowhere to run, nobody to turn to because social services have been shut down amid austerity cuts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article