If bookmakers and polls are still be trusted, Andy Burnham is favourite to become Ed Miliband's successor as leader of the Labour Party.
As such, the Shadow Secretary for State for Health (for England) might feel entitled to declare there is "a case" for separate parties north and south of the Border. It is not self-evident Mr Burnham has such a right.
That said, it is no longer obvious why Jim Murphy is entitled to award himself a month in the Scottish leader's job while he prepares a plan for reform. Which successor could agree to be bound by such a blueprint? What credibility still attaches to Mr Murphy, who talked a good game, lost 40 of 41 MPs, and won the confidence of the party's Scottish Executive thanks to his own vote and the backing, it seems, of Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale, a late addition to the squad?
Who does speak for Labour in Scotland? Many, led by Mr Murphy, would baulk at the idea of Len McCluskey, general secretary of the Unite union, as arbiter. Nevertheless, the lack of one-person, one vote in the affairs of the Scottish party still allows unions an undue say. Mr McCluskey is another with dubious credentials as a kingmaker, but he is not first on the list of the party's problems.
For Labour, in Scotland and beyond, an almighty, enveloping mess threatens to descend into tribal warfare. Blairites, Brownites, modernisers, traditionalists, left, right: it is easier to say what divides those loyal to the red rose than what unites them. The question of what becomes of the party in Scotland is deeply serious, yet answers are few. Those with the authority to speak have yet to be found.
Mr Burnham - and he is not alone - seems to be turning his back on a Scottish problem in pursuit of votes elsewhere. Talking on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show yesterday, he had few details to offer of "the case" for an autonomous party in Scotland, whether the relationship would be formal or informal, or what this could one day mean for devolved government. Inadvertently, he raised the question of legitimacy. For whom does he speak when he notes that "case"?
Mr Murphy and Mr McCluskey seem to be happier squabbling, for now. No doubt they could explain the reasons at length. Very few voters are liable to spend much time on such feuds. One cavils, the other carps, and Mr Burnham pretends to understand while conducting an entirely separate leadership campaign. Even a terrible election for Labour should not have reduced the party to this condition.
Why should it matter? After all, across the United Kingdom, Labour is a beaten party. In Scotland, it could not muster even a quarter of the votes cast. But this remains the official Opposition at Westminster and at Holyrood. With a minority government in London showing its colours, and with an SNP administration in Edinburgh resembling an electoral steamroller, democracy requires a coherent opposition. A summer of internecine Labour warfare will not meet the need.
For the party, the alternative is noisy irrelevance while once-minor rivals attempt to fill the vacuum. None is entirely plausible, as yet. The fact underlines the responsibility falling on those who claim the right to speak without having earned their right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article