There is considerable merit in the approach taken by the new Campaign for Scottish Home Rule.
Those behind the campaign are calling for an underlying methodology to provide a foundation for the deliberations of the Smith Commission on greater powers for Scotland.
The vision of home rule they argue for would see greater powers going hand in hand with moves to make the Scottish Parliament more accountable and democratic, particularly by tying tax-raising powers to legislative powers.
The campaign already has genuine cross-party support, with former MSPs from the Scottish Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the SNP involved, as well as former first minister Henry McLeish, and a representative of the Green Party.
Its steering group also includes a former moderator of the Church of Scotland and representatives from business and academia. The man behind it, Ben Thomson, is the chairman of centre-right thinktank Reform Scotland, who proposed the concept of devo-plus during the referendum campaign.
He says any new settlement should meet three key principles.
The campaign's starting assumption is that all powers ought to be presumed best devolved to Scotland, with Westminster then challenged to make a case for any powers it wants to retain at UK level.
This is an interesting inversion of the balance of proof, and might avoid the sense of resentment caused by a perception that MPs at Westminster hand Scotland limited powers based largely on self-interest.
The second principle is that greater powers come with greater responsibility for funding them. Regardless of which powers are retained and which will be part of further devolution, it is they that should dictate the funding formula for Scotland. If granted new powers, the Scottish Government should also be required to take charge of raising the funds to pay for them.
The final call is for a better relationship between Scotland and Westminster to help bring change about. Strengthened mutual respect will be to the advantage of both parties, the campaign says.
It aims to prevent the next settlement from descending into a matter of simple horse-trading between the different political parties.
Such an outcome would be out of keeping with the high levels of democratic engagement in the independence referendum campaign and the public mood.
The big question is how these worthy and admirable ideas can work in the context of a fast changing political and electoral context.
High ideals matter, but there is also a requirement to deliver new powers promptly. The Smith Commission's timetable is tight and, given the pledges made to Scotland's voters, it is important that it is adhered to.
Nevertheless, the home rule campaigners have made a valuable appeal for intellectual cohesion to underpin the debate over greater powers. It is one the Smith Commission would do well to heed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article