To be an activist requires fiery conviction, sometimes in the face of what seem like insurmountable obstacles.
Fifteen years ago, the idea of gay couples being able to form legally recognised partnerships, let alone marry, seemed to many like an impossible goal.
Politicians and campaigners who supported the idea would take encouragement from the example of places such as Denmark, where same-sex partnerships had been recognised since the late 1980s, and from progressive American states like California where the idea of same-sex domestic partnerships was gaining ground. Even so, civil same-sex unions seemed a long way off in the UK and same-sex marriage even further. What polling evidence existed appeared to show stubborn public opposition to the whole concept. Activists kept going because they believed what they were fighting for was right.
If only they had known just how quickly and decisively public opinion would change. Civil partnerships between same-sex couples were legalised in 2004 and now same-sex marriage is well on the way to becoming reality, all with the backing of a majority of voters. The latest YouGov survey on attitudes to gay marriage indicates that 56% of Scots now support the idea. The poll comes just two weeks after the Marriage And Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Bill passed its first stage at Holyrood; taken together, all this underlines that a major improvement in the status of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people has taken place since the millennium.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the latest polling evidence shows that support for gay marriage drops with rising age: 77% of 18-24-year-olds are in favour compared with 38% of those aged over 60. Over time, the majority in favour may rise still further. Women are significantly more likely to support gay marriage than men and that trend may change more slowly; even so, in both genders and in every age group except the over-60s, more people are in favour than against. What seemed a dream for equality campaigners has become reality.
Quite how the anti-gay marriage campaign Scotland for Marriage has managed to infer from the figures that "MSPs at Holyrood are utterly out of step with the voters", is hard to fathom. The poll does not show that, although a bigger percentage of MSPs support gay marriage than the wider public, according to the survey. The implication among those against gay marriage appears to be that, if a minority of voters oppose a change in the law, then the Government should not change it, even if a majority do support change. That could hardly be described as fair.
That is not to say the views of those who oppose the change should not be respected. A significant minority - 35% - do oppose gay marriage, some because of their sincerely held religious beliefs. That is why it is so important that the bill has balanced the freedom of same-sex couples to marry with freedom of conscience by ensuring that no faith group or celebrant will be compelled to perform gay marriage ceremonies. The UK Equality Act of 2010 will be changed to prevent celebrants facing the threat of criminal charges. Those safeguards are crucial. The guiding principle must be that same-sex couples should be able to marry if they wish and religious groups to conduct themselves according to their conscience, without either imposing their will on the other. Beyond that, the law should not go.
This bill has been controversial but, in time, same-sex marriage will become part of the social and legal landscape. After all, this survey shows that many people greet the whole concept just as they do heterosexual marriage, with nothing more than a smile and a shrug.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article