The country’s president, Ólafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify a bill to pay Britain and Holland the £3.6 billion cost of guaranteeing Icesave accounts after Landsbanki UK went bust in 2008. Faced with paying around £12,000 per head – about £40,000 per family – the Icelanders have decided that, on balance, they’d rather not. At least not now.
Shock horror – send a gunboat. But the Icelanders have a point. Icesave was the UK subsidiary of a private bank that went bust. Very few Icelanders had any knowledge of what was going on and even fewer benefited financially, so why should they be liable now? The interest on the debt alone is equal to the cost of Iceland’s healthcare system. It was the British Government’s decision to bail out Icesave along with the other insolvent banks. If banks don’t have to pay their debts why should Iceland?
Perhaps the Nordic state should ask to become part of the Government’s asset protection scheme, like RBS. Alternatively, the Treasury could pay a call to the former owners of Landsbanki, many of whom live in London enjoying tax-free non-dom status. Landsbanki had assets of well over £3bn. As usual, the profits have been privatised but the losses are socialised. Perhaps we should all set ourselves up as banks and get our debts paid.
This isn’t quite as daft as it sounds. Over in Kuwait, the National Assembly has passed a bill for the government to take all the debts run up by its citizens during the boom years – around $24bn. Under the scheme, the Kuwait government would buy the loans from its three million citizens, wipe out interest payments and pay capital back gradually over 10 years. It’s the ultimate get-out-of-jail-free-card for a country used to living the high life without actually having to pay for it. Just, er, like Britain.
British citizens have debts of £1.5 trillion. Perhaps the Government should just add this to the trillion of liabilities of the British banks. Well, in for a penny in for a pound. If the City of London’s debts can be put in cold storage, why not ours? Then everyone could just go out and spend again like it was 2007. Actually, we’re already doing that. The high street stores have been astonished by the continued spending power of the British consumer, who is, by any reasonable standards, drowning in debt.
And, of course, we can pay for it all just by printing more money. In fact, why not give British consumers a bonus for handling their finances so irresponsibly, just like the banks? Then there’d be even more funny money to spend on cheap tat. Really, Gordon Brown is slipping up here. This could be an election winner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article