The First Minister was taken to task last week by commentators and businesspeople for joining demonstrations against job losses at Diageo’s Johnnie Walker plant in Kilmarnock. Lord Mandelson, First Secretary, has laid into the Phoenix Four who bought MG Rover for the price of a petrol cap and made off with £40 million.
It’s raised the whole question of whether it’s right and proper for senior politicians to clash openly with business. Charges of hypocrisy and grandstanding abound. Do they really care or are they just after cheap populist votes?
It was undignified, we were told last week, for Alex Salmond to be behaving like Arthur Scargill or Jimmy Reid, criticising one of Scotland’s largest firms for putting profit before social responsibility. The head of CBI Scotland, Iain McMillan, condemned Salmond’s behaviour for putting future investment at risk, though the people of Kilmarnock rather liked the idea of a politician rolling his sleeves up for once and actually getting down to street level.
At First Minister’s Questions, Salmond made no apology for his megaphone diplomacy. “I am proud of my attendance at that rally,” he barked. “I’m proud of the workers and council and unions and all parties who attended that rally, I thought it was a formidable and inspiring demonstration of people anxious to defend their right to work.”
There is, however, a question about the FM’s credibility as a born-again class warrior since he has been so committed in recent years to private enterprise, low taxation and deregulation. Diageo bosses dismissed proposals made by the government task force on Kilmarnock as politically motivated, economically illiterate and likely to jeopardise 4,000 other jobs. They said they understood the market a lot better than politicians.
Critics said Salmond was only “grandstanding” and hunting for votes in an SNP target seat, but that’s what politicians do.
Listen indeed to Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, laying into the “Phoenix Four” who took the money from the MG Rover rescue and ran. Mandelson reached for the megaphone to make it clear to Labour voters in the Midlands, where Rover used to support 50,000 jobs, that he was on their side. It would have been churlish to point out that it was a Labour trade and industry secretary, Stephen Byers, who handed MG Rover to the Phoenix Four in the first place.
MG Rover’s fate was a vivid illustration of what has happened to British capitalism during the Labour decade when the economy turned from making things to manipulating debt.
The Phoenix Four used complex financial engineering, which allowed them to gain from shifting debt and assets around the monopoly board. But they didn’t break any laws. Indeed, by the degraded standards of modern business practice, they should probably be commended for their ingenuity. Modern turbo-capitalism doesn’t have much time for men in overalls making things, whether it’s cars or whisky.
There was something richly ironic in Peter Mandelson attacking businessmen for indulging in dodgy deals. He has had to resign twice from the cabinet over his complex relations with wealthy individuals. The first time was over a housing loan from the Labour minister, Geoffrey Robinson and the second was after allegations that he had helped an Indian businessman to get a British passport. Lord Mandelson now lives in a £2.2m house overlooking Regents Park purchased entirely legitimately through legal earnings.
No one could accuse Alex Salmond of enriching himself, though he did become a cheerleader for Scotland’s banks, especially RBS, before it was revealed to be the world’s worst bank. Perhaps, indeed, that experience made him rethink his uncritical endorsement of private enterprise. For in the end he is right. Firms do have a social responsibility, and it doesn’t do any harm for them to be reminded of that every now and again, with or without the megaphone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article