TIME to 'fess up.
I've been wrong. And it's only right to admit it.
I could have sworn I was right. I felt it in my heart and head. It all made sense. It was all so obvious. And all so wrong.
So time to get these wrongs off my chest, not least because I committed them in print. First up, The Wire. I wrote despairing that hundreds of five-star Amazon reviews could be so wrong. The Wire wasn't the best television show in history. It was awful. So I said. At the time, admittedly, I'd a bee in my millinery about being unable to understand strong, streetwise American accents, particularly when mumbled. It didn't help that this was in the earlier days of flat-screen televisions, which had no proper outlet for sound.
Nor could I find much to identify with in fat, junk-food eating cops and drug-dealers in impossibly baggy trousers. However, friends urged me to think again. So I gave it another go and, albeit with the help of subtitles, I'm hooked. Terrific television. Loving it. So apologies to Jack and others who tellt me I was wrang.
Secondly, fat people. I said all these claims about an obesity epidemic were poppycock, on the thin evidence that none of my friends was fat. However, I take it back. Standing in the supermarket the other day, I looked around and realised I was the only non-fat person present.
Thirdly, The Silmarillion. I said Tolkien's lesser-known work was unreadable. Again, I gave it another go and, while the tome is not novelistic and has an undoubtedly dry style, it proves to be moving and mind-expanding too.
Clearly, I could have taken out a special supplement to right all my wrongs. But three will suffice for now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article