One of the most common relationship fallacies must surely be the oft-repeated "fact" that the majority of men prefer women without make-up on.
So thank goodness for the singer Gwen Stefani, who confessed to a journalist recently that her husband Gavin Rossdale prefers her with make-up on. Stefani, whose signature make-up look is winged eyeliner and bright red lipstick, said she wears make-up at home because it pleases her husband. Her comments were interpreted by some as anti-feminist but I understand where she is coming from. Making an effort to look nice for your partner is something that should be applauded rather than discouraged. I wear make-up most days and not because I have to, nor because my boyfriend wants me to, but because I like the ritual of putting it on every morning and I like the way it makes me look better.
Make-up is a playful way to express yourself, and it is often one of the few times in the day when women take some time out for themselves. I grew up watching my mum apply lotions and cosmetics to her face every morning, while sitting at her dressing table. She refers to make-up application as "putting my face on" and every day, after doing just that, she feels ready to face the world.
It is no surprise that cosmetics sales continue to rise, even in times of recession, because a slick of lipstick or eyeliner is an instant pick-me-up that is worth the £10 or £20 price tag. That said, there are women who take their obsession with make-up too far, as witnessed on a recent episode of Channel 4's One Born Every Minute where one expectant mum was re-applying lipstick between contractions. I'm as vain as the next girl, but even I wouldn't dream of taking it that far.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article