O to be a night bird.
There is virtually nothing in life I wouldn't rather do first thing in the morning: working, writing, household tasks, gluttonous feasting, even possibly drinking.
I once tried out being a film critic, but decided that was too much of a challenge, since, for evening screenings, I required to take a kind of chaperone who could watch and report on the sections of the film I missed through sleeping.
Actually I thought it was OK to be a lark, even possibly quite virtuous. But now comes the bad news. If you want to get ahead, we are told by a University of Madrid study, be a night owl.
If your body clock dictates you are one who likes to work and play into the wee hours, then you belong to the group that scores, in tests, higher on inductive reasoning, tend to be not successful academically, and in the end are likely to earn more and have a prestigious occupation.
Suddenly the tendency towards waking up clear-headed at 6am seems like a sadly crippling disadvantage. Suddenly it seems that if you doze off during the pudding course of a dinner party or slump in a comatose state on the sofa at 8pm, you are cut out only for life's slow lane.
To be honest, I had always known it. Those night birds had always seemed more exotic, exciting and faintly romantic, which is probably why I got hitched to one. He carried about him all the mystery of the night. I wanted to join him there, to battle my way through the wall of sleepiness and on to the final stages of the party marathon. But, without chemical intervention, you can't really fight your body clock. And there are advantages too. Someone has to be vaguely alive at 6am when the kids get up.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article