I THOUGHT our NHS was better protected than down south.
How gullible can you be?
A few weeks ago I was diagnosed with lung cancer, after a chest x-ray, the cancer having spread from an earlier operation for breast cancer. I am now embarking on a lengthy treatment of chemotherapy at the Western General Hospital in Edinburgh. As an 80-year-old who lives alone, I naturally assumed I could be picked up and returned by Hospital Transport, as had happened for my previous hospital treatment.
But when I phoned Hospital Transport I was asked if I could manage to walk to my door unaided. When I said I could I was told I had disqualified myself and was given an Edinburgh number, which turned out to be Dial an Ambulance. I would have to register, and would have to pay. Since I live in Penicuik this would presumably be substantial, though they were unable to give me any details, as they were inundated with calls from patients who have just been made aware of the withdrawal of the free hospital transport service.
Its a daunting enough prospect to undergo chemo without working out whether I can catch a bus both to and from the hospital (more than an hour through Edinburgh), and whether it is sensible to try to do this while I am coping with chemo and its various side-effects.
When I phoned the Oncology Centre at the Western General I was told that they had been made aware of the changes and now, as a cancer patient, I would qualify for free hospital transport.
All right for me, I suppose, but what about all the other patients whom I have met in the past on Hospital Transport? Elderly patients, and those with arthritis who can manage back to their front door unaided will have to pay, or arrange to be taken and picked up from hospital by friends. However you look at it, this is a diminution of service, all in the sacred cause of saving a bit of money. Who thought this wheeze up?
Margaret Macaulay,
Deanburn, Penicuik.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article