THE statements made by Care Not Killing (CNK) concerning Gordon Ross's attempt to clarify his legal position regarding assisted suicide is revealing ("Anti-suicide alliance poised to oppose right-to-die case", The Herald, February 11).
Rather than repeatedly raising theoretical concerns about safeguards, which would appear to be incapable of being answered to its satisfaction, CNK's underlying motive has become clear. It is to deny choice.
The law's impact in maintaining the intolerable suffering of some of those who are nearing the end of their lives is simply ignored, while its "powerful deterrent effect" is welcomed. Such a pitiless refusal to recognise and accept the means of bringing unendurable distress to an end is lamentable.
Tolerating the measured behaviour of others, with which we do not agree, is part of belonging to a civilised society. The endeavours of a seriously ill, yet still feisty, man to clarify the law concerning his own situation is admirable. Mr Ross deserves our support for what he is doing.
Linda Britton,
Hayston Court,
Kirkintilloch.
WHILE Alan Clayton (Letters, February 12) is entitled to his views and opposition to Gordon Ross's attempt to have the law on an assisted suicide clarified ("'I will go to our supreme court for the right to die'", The Herald February 10), I question the accuracy of the figures he quotes citing where it has "all gone wrong" elsewhere.
If people in the Netherlands are being regularly duped about the real figures and the situation is as alarming as he contends, you would think at least one investigative journalist would be on the case screaming blue murder from the rooftops. In fact, Dutch public opinion of their medical profession is very high indeed, as is their continued support for assisted suicide. Similarly, citizens of Oregon have one of the highest rates of satisfaction with their doctors and surgeons in the United States. Either a whole lot of folk are having the wool pulled over their eyes or perhaps they actually think over the issues for themselves, see how the law works and support personal choice in this matter.
Sheila Duffy,
Friends at the End,
3 Hamilton Drive,
Glasgow.
I NOTE with interest that our Scottish Parliament has now voted overwhelmingly in favour of same-sex marriage ("Tears of relief after same-sex legislation", The Herald, February 10).
We should bear in mind that more than 56% of those members of the public who were polled were in favour. Recalling that in another poll more than 70% are in favour of assisted suicide, I expect that our Holyrood parliamentarians will be hugely supportive of Margo Macdonald's bill, especially when it has such massive public backing. Perhaps a large majority of our MSPs would have to be suffering from terminal illnesses before they could be expected to do the right thing.
John Frame,
11 Lochside,
45 Drymen Road,
Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article