It is proper that the rights of minorities in Scotland are discussed and progressed through parliamentary and public consultation processes (Letters, March 9 & 12).

The privately funded, purported referendum about the abolition of Section 28 should serve as a cautionary tale about the hostility and prejudice such an initiative can stir up against a part of society.

All of the parties represented in the Holyrood Parliament, with the exception of the Scottish Conservatives, pledged their support for same-sex marriage during the election campaign last May. The people had an opportunity to express a view on the issue then, as many did in writing to candidates to ascertain their views, and ultimately in deciding who to vote for. If adhering to election promises is not democratic, what is?

Since then an initial consultation on whether the Scottish Government should legislate for same-sex marriage has taken place, garnering more responses than any such exercise in the history of the Scottish Parliament. The Government is busy analysing over 50,000 responses; if it decides to go ahead with legislation on same-sex marriage there will be a further consultation on the detail of any bill, which will undoubtedly engage thousands of people across Scottish society on the topic for the second time. This is democracy in action.

Colin Macfarlane,

Director, Stonewall Scotland,

Mansfield Traquair Centre,

Edinburgh.

Tim Hopkins misses the central point of my letter to which he kindly responds, which was that equating same-sex couples with heterosexual couples is contrary to reason (Letters, March 12.).

He fails to distinguish the support he claims for religious bodies to do what they want in their own places of worship; and the influence of religious values in society.

I agree with him on the first point, that the freedom of religious bodies should be respected within the bounds of just laws.

On the second point he confuses the acceptance that marriage is between a man and a woman in civil law with it being "an attempt by the Catholic Church to impose its specific rules on marriage".

The Catholic Church on this latter point simply supports reason and civil law should be built on reason.

John Deighan,

Parliamentary Officer,

Catholic Parliamentary Office,

5 St Vincent Place,

Glasgow.