FOR decades the entire subsidy burden for providing electricity to the Shetland Isles has fallen on the shoulders of the electricity consumers of the north of Scotland, but suddenly David Cameron, on his first visit to these islands, announces that he is to spread the subsidy cost across the whole of Great Britain.
Given that Westminster has control over energy policy in the UK, why is it only now that we get such news? Could it be that the forthcoming referendum has had some influence?
It is only a couple of weeks ago that the Scottish Government's Commission on Energy Regulation drew attention to this subsidy arrangement, so it appears that an eagle-eyed civil servant in London has spotted an opportunity to enable David Cameron to demonstrate "how passionately he cares about the United Kingdom". How many more examples of his passionate care can we expect in the next two months?
When the old North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board (NSHEB) was privatised in 1990 at a very generous price, a large proportion of its electricity was being produced by its 1,400 MWs of hydro, most of which had been built by that company since the war and paid for by its Highland consumers. These hydro stations were at that time producing the cheapest electricity in the UK but no special compensation was paid to the Highlands.
A bit of relief from subsidising the Shetlands is welcome, but how about a bit of compensation for the massive hydro asset that they lost 25 years ago?
Nick Dekker,
1 Nairn Way,
Cumbernauld.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article