THERE has been much sanctimonious twaddle about Andy Murray's nationality and Alex Salmond's flag-waving since Sunday, a category in which I have to place the Rt Rev John Taylor's contribution (Letters, July 10).
To declare that he is "ashamed" of the Scottish flag is in my opinion shameful in itself.
As for the knighthood nonsense, this is a cynical attempt to sweep Murray into the British establishment before the independence referendum. All honour to him, but it is too soon to burden him with a title. Let him achieve his potential (another three-four years perhaps) then, by all means heap honours and titles on him. His achievements by then will be even greater.
The British honours system is, in any case, thoroughly discredited – the succession of incompetents, crooks, timeservers and the truly nasty who have taken their bow at the Palace has discredited it for the deserving, but if we must have it, far better to make his mother a Dame. Judy Murray's dedication to her sons, and to the sport of tennis in Scotland has been immense, and she seems to be a really nice person.
David Roche,
1 Alder Grove,
Scone,
Perth.
MUCH has been said over the last few days in respect of First Minister Alex Salmond and his flag-waving (Letters, July 9 and 10). Much of it is incorrect. The All England Lawn Tennis Association has very strict rules. In particular, rule 15, para 3 section b: "No person/s may remove their sports coat/jacket in the Royal Box without prior written consent from the committee."
Readers will have noted that David Cameron had removed his jacket and when the TV cameras pictured him at the joyous culmination of the match, will have also seen Mr Salmond trying his best to drape the only available large enough piece of material he had to hand to help screen our Prime Minister's social faux pas.
Michael Campbell,
Leanaig,
Conon Bridge.
I AGREE with the Rt Rev John Taylor regarding the pilfering of the Saltire by the Nationalists. I used to fly the Saltire with pride but after the ambush by the Yes group, only the Union flag or the Lion Rampant adorn my flagpole.
Peter Jensen,
Tigh an Abhainn,
Skipness,
Tarbert.
YOU reported that Andy Murray will declare his opinion on independence once he studies all the data on the debate ("Murray: I will declare my hand on independence", July 9). Good luck to him, as we have all been waiting on this from both Yes and No campaigns rather than the continual generic statements and rebuffs we get all the time without any meat on the bone.
It is interesting how Mr Salmond with his flag-waving makes political capital out of Murray's success while not allowing him to vote in the referendum as he lives in England, while 60,000 immigrants who live in Scotland for a couple of years with little interest in our constitution will be able to vote in the referendum.
Andrew Kerr,
28 Benview Terrace.
Fishcross,
Alloa.
IT would not matter what Alex Salmond did, he would be pilloried from every quarter, while other Scottish political leaders, Unionists who effectively, by dint of their failures, handed power over to the SNP, get off Scot-free.
What would these people have made of the sight I had on holiday in Norfolk (Sandringham territory) during the Jubilee celebrations last year, where there was hardly a Union flag to be seen. The emblem of choice was St George's Cross, indicating that it was the Queen of England they were celebrating, not the Queen of the UK. But you would not expect that kind of news item to feature on BBC Scotland and it had no significance south of the Border, where they think they are doing nothing unusual.
Douglas R Mayer,
76 Thomson Crescent,
Currie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article