THERE are real financial problems for those at the bottom of the heap in society.
The minimum wage or zero hours contracts do not provide enough for a family to live on. These people are supported, at present, by in work welfare but are now the target of our Tory government. The debate has become polarised between the parties but there is little in the way of a radical solution.
When I was young jobs were plentiful and there was no excuse for the lazy or workshy. Nowadays those who are not skilled in communication or who cannot put together a good CV are very often left without any work to adequately support them. This stems back to the Thatcher years where a pool of unemployed was seen as a sensible method of controlling wages and trade union power. This orthodoxy has been encouraged and perpetuated by neo-liberal economics now practised in almost every society throughout the world.
In my view we should pick up on the Tory mantra; we should make work pay and "hardworking people" should be supported. This should be done, not by tax cuts for the rich, but by legislating that the living wage should be paid to all people in work. This would, at a stroke, reduce the welfare bill by around £30 billion. As a follow-up the state should provide meaningful work to everyone that is fit for it. There is certainly enough work needing done at the lowest level throughout society for those people to do.
These actions would increase GDP to a very large degree, increase taxation income markedly and provide opportunities for entrepreneurs to increase custom rather than, as now, the state subsidising bad employers, the tax take bumping along at a rate insufficient to repay the national debt and businesses struggling for custom. These suggestions would change the dynamic so that employers would have to compete for staff rather than, as now, paying as little as they can get away with.
DS Blackwood,
1 Douglas Drive East, Helensburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article