I AM truly saddened that such an intelligent contributor to these letters pages as Allan C Steele should put his name to such a divisive and ill-considered letter as that on hunting (November 18).
To link illegal poaching with legal foxhunting shows a strange attitude to the law. It would appear that he is justifying law-breaking on the basis of poverty. Perhaps he should try that as a defence when arrested if he attempted shoplifting. I am sure he would get short shrift from the courts.
To add what might be considered class prejudice to his argument is nothing short of irresponsible. I know several people who hunt and they do not conform to his "landed gentry" jibe, but come from all sectors of society.
Hunting and shooting are not "wanton killing of birds and animals" but in the case of hunting it is vermin control. Perhaps Mr Steele has never entered a hen house into which a fox has gained access and seen the mass slaughter of every living creature.
In the case of shooting this is effectively harvesting a food supply which has lived a free and natural life up to that point. The quality of life of these creatures is infinitely better than the poor battery animals which stock the supermarket shelves.
Mr Steele should note that a recent report showed that those involved in hunting and shooting did far more for conservation of wildlife than all the charitable organisations put together.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent,
Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article