FOLLOWING Ian Bell's two articles last week ("Farage forages to stand up best for right-wing England", The Herald, April 30, and "Vote pitches old pessimisms against a vibrant optimism", The Herald, May 3), and the comments thereon by your correspondents, I feel I must come clean:
I intend to vote for Ukip in the European elections.
I acknowledge that, ever since the pontifications of Sydney and Beatrice Webb and other leading Fabians a century ago, the Left has claimed the moral high ground. Everything that we old-fashioned liberals hold to is ipso facto wicked. We believe, following Beveridge, in a welfare safety net, not a hammock. We believe in the 1944 Education Act with its tripartite set-up of grammar schools, secondary moderns and technical schools, organised selectively by the 11-plus examination, as the best guarantor of social mobility and working class advancement. Above all we believe in free markets, free trade, capitalism, limited government and the widest space for individual liberty and personal responsibility. All these are predicated on Gladstonian fiscal continence and sound money. We believe that governments, in the interests of economic and social stability and harmony, must have power to control immigration, as indeed they do everywhere except in the European Union. Since only Ukip holds to these ideas, the party will get my support.
Oddballs though many Ukip members are, they are no different from the weirdos and nerds that inhabit the other parties - witness some of the members of the Militant Tendency, the International Marxist Group and the Socialist Workers who were in and out of the Labour Party in the 70s and 80s. And the Anglophobic behaviour of some members of the SNP on a regular basis at their conferences just makes the flesh creep.
I shall vote for Ukip simply because the European Union has become the greatest impediment to all I believe in. Electing a member to represent me in the European Parliament is pointless. That body is neither democratic, responsible nor accountable. It is a retirement home for party apparatchiks to live the good life at the taxpayers' expense. The May 22 European election is the nearest we shall get to a referendum on membership of the EU, and we should grasp the opportunity to shake the system.
Moreover, the leaderships of the other parties have to answer the questions of why they support an EU that, via the euro, does down the poor, the youth and the working class of southern Europe; why they implement wasteful, eye-wateringly expensive European green energy directives; and why they support high food prices through the Common Agricultural Policy. In addition, the SNP has got itself into the position of consigning its goal of independence to a growing political integration organised by Brussels and Berlin. That is beyond parody.
So Ukip will get my support. No doubt that, as the Left screams, makes me a racist too.
Richard Mowbray,
14 Ancaster Drive,
Glasgow.
LABOUR'S EU election leaflet has just dropped through the letterbox. On Europe, its main selling point seems to be "£135, the amount every Scottish household benefits by" from the UK's annual rebate. I am no statistician, but I understand that not once in the last 32 years has the UK got more out than it paid in. Could Johann Lamont explain this mystery subsidy? Or better still, send out £135 in a brown envelope to the address below?
William B Robertson,
101 Gilmour Street,
Eaglesham.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article