I READ with interest your recent article on mountain ("Wildlife groups call for ban on grouse moor hare culling", The Herald, April 14) that stated 10 "conservation" bodies have asked for a three-year ban on the culling of mountain hares on areas managed for grouse shooting because of a lack of scientific information on the impact that these culls were having.
As a keeper living and working in the uplands for more than 20 years I have been involved in the sustainable management of mountain hares and agree with the comment from SNH that the hare population is cyclical.
The point being missed is that mountain hares are more abundant on areas managed for grouse shooting because good predator control measures are in place. Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust science has already proved that breeding success of all moorland birds is four times more productive where predator control is taking place and it is the same for mountain hares. In addition culls do not take place annually - like grouse they are only undertaken when there is a sustainable number.
This attempt to criticise a well-established practice that has maintained a healthy mountain hare population on grouse moors for many years seems like just another ill-informed swipe at grouse moor management. Perhaps some of the 10 organisations who signed up to this should practice some predator control on their own land and measure the four-fold effect it would have on biodiversity?
Ian Elliot,
Upland Keeper on the Lammermuir Hills,
The Estate Office,The Hopes, Gifford, East Lothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article