PETER Russell (Letters, July 15) claims the Yes campaign is denigrating the record of the Labour Party.
No-one is denigrating the achievements of Keir Hardie or Atlee's government, but the last Labour government and Ed Miliband's Shadow Cabinet had and have little in common with either.
The minimum wage, devolution and relative peace in Northern Ireland were a few high points above a sea of continued Thatcherism.
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown expanded the Conservatives' private finance initiatives (PFIs) in the NHS, renaming them public-private partnership (PPPs). To fund big profits for PFI consortia hospitals now have fewer beds and fully trained staff than those they replaced.
Their governments also continued privatisation by the back door in the English NHS. Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham has since said health policies should be "consistent across England, Scotland and Wales". That means further privatising Scotland's NHS next. New Labour also began many of the "welfare reforms" continued by the Coalition. Labour gave the disgraced Atos its cushy contract, with commissions for every disabled person to whom it denied benefits - commissions it kept even if its victims won an appeal, if they lived that long.
Scotland has the option of something better. Scotland has the option of becoming independent and choosing from party policies that aren't designed to try to take votes back from Conservative and Ukip voters in the south of England. Scotland has the option to vote Yes and provide social justice for our own people and a progressive example to the remaining UK.
Then there might be a Scottish Labour Party whose policies wouldn't make Keir Hardie, Clement Atlee and Nye Bevan sick to their stomachs.
Duncan McFarlane,
Beanshields, Braidwood, Carluke.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article