I am perplexed over the debate about Ed Miliband's assertion that, should the Labour party win the next General Election, it would freeze the price of energy for 20 months.
If he really wishes to help the British public with regards to the cost of energy he should ensure his party formulates a cohesive and sensible energy policy.
No party in government, of whatever persuasion, for the past few decades has done more than bow down to unfair EU carbon policies and try to placate environmentalists in an effort to win more votes. We are sitting on top of billions of tons of coal and we have missed the opportunity to invest in the research and development to ascertain the means to burn this energy source cleanly and safely.
We are closing down several old-fashioned, highly polluting coal-fired power stations, which is excellent, but we are not replacing them with sufficient gas-fired, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) stations to make up for the lost generation capacity. Those CCGT stations depend on gas that we will have to import from Russia and other foreign sources.
It is time our politicians looked at the size of the UK on the globe and considered what difference a few new, cleaner, coal-fired power stations would make to the carbon dioxide output compared with the USA, China, India and Russia. We have energy in abundance under our feet. We have excellent engineers developing tidal and wave energy sources, which are dependable and predictable, yet our leaders insist on subsidising unreliable, unpredictable windmills and are committed to purchasing gas from foreign sources.
Due to the reduction in our power-generation capacity it is already too late to prevent the blackouts that will take place in 2015/16, should we experience a severe winter. However we should be investing heavily in the energy sources that we have so we will have clean, reliable and affordable energy for future generations.
Moray P Deane,
Greenshieldhouse Farm,
Carnwath, Lanark.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article