THE CND poll estimate that three-quarters of Labour election candidates are opposed to Trident renewal may or may not be entirely accurate but clearly reflects significant disquiet about British nuclear weapons amongst mainstream politicians ("CND: Three quarters of Labour hopefuls oppose renewing Trident", The Herald, March 4).
Somehow that disquiet becomes muted in public political debate. There may be a parallel to that in the anti-nuclear views expressed by some retired military personnel, and within the Establishment there may be debate and uncertainty about possession of weapons of mass destruction which does not reach the public sphere.
Yet the leadership of the main UK parties seem unable to countenance any alternative to maintaining a nuclear weapons arsenal for the next 30 years. Are we faced here with suppression of real discussion and with an apparent political consensus not based on genuine views and advice within government? Instead there is the perception that being open to a process of nuclear disarmament would somehow diminish Britain's status and would be unacceptable in the voting booth. If that is so, the more this debate is openly pursued the better. And a good starting point for the forthcoming election would be for constituents to follow up the CND initiative by clarifying the views of all their local candidates.
Duncan MacIntyre,
74 Montgomery Street,
Eaglesham.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article