THE Rev Dr John Cameron (Letters, April 16) doubts "whether Raphael Lemkin was justified in comparing it (the Armenian Genocide) to the industrialised extermination of Eastern Europe's Jews".
I am unaware that he ever did and I certainly did not assert in my letter of April 15 that he did so. However, unlike Dr Cameron apparently, the only thing I would have noted would have been that the methods were different albeit the outcome was the same. The land was cleansed of an unwanted people.
Indeed, the American-Pole, Elie Wiesel, a survivor of the Shoah - of Auscwitz, Buna and Buchenwald - and the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate for his work as Chairman of the "President's Committee on the Holocaust", called the Armenian Genocide the "Holocaust before the Holocaust".
Historically, the Armenian Genocide can, indeed, be linked in time and place with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. But its roots lie elsewhere, in the right-wing nationalism of France and Germany in the early 1900s with which the "Young Turks", later of the Union and Progress Party - Talaat Bey, Enver and Cemel Pasha - were imbued. And, of course, their other great Western influence was freemasonry, Union and Progress being established along the same lines as the Italian paramasonic revolutionary society the "Carbonaries". Unable to utilize any national identity, for the Turks were of such disparate origins, they focused on a Suuni identity and the infidels became their chosen bogeymen.
Allied to Germany during the First World War, and Germany having given refuge to Talaat Bey when he had to flee, it was noticeable that the Germany Ambassador to the Holy See, His Excellency Herr Reinhard Schweppe, was absent from Sunday's commemorative Mass.
Hugh McLoughlin,
24 Russell Street,
Mossend, Bellshill.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article