The warning from Royal Mail that competition from rival delivery firms is putting the Universal Service Obligation (USO) at risk ("Drop in Royal mail profits threatens universal delivery", The Herald, November 20) is utterly predictable.
This obligation ensures the delivery of letters to all areas of the UK at a single price and is hugely important to businesses and individuals in rural areas of Scotland. However, increased parcel delivery competition is naturally hitting Royal Mail revenues.
The sell-off of the Royal Mail was nothing but a shambles since day one. A privatised postal service in a competitive market will undoubtedly put pressure on government to reduce the terms of the USO, as its competitors cherry-pick profitable urban routes leading to a reduced service in rural and less affluent areas. Now we are told there is a material risk to the USO and that the delivery service across the UK will come under unmanageable strain.
Royal Mail should never have been privatised and it is painfully clear that the UK Government should never have sold off a valuable public asset at well below its true value and despite all the warning about the end of the USO. We know the majority of Scots were totally opposed to the privatisation of Royal Mail, more than any other part of the UK. What we need is a postal service that meets the needs of our communities and which is brought back into public ownership.
Alex Orr
Flat 2, 77 Leamington Terrace, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article